Skip to main content

Research

UK MOT results 2025: which used cars fail, and why

In 2025, 27.7% of the 33,210,823 class 4 first MOT tests in Great Britain ended in an initial fail: a fail, or a fail that was fixed at the test station. That is DVSA’s own measure, and it is the one used throughout this page. Here is how it changes with the model, the age and mileage of the car and the area it was tested in, and which parts cause the failures, from the complete 2025 DVSA file.

MOT results only: the test does not look at the engine, clutch or gearbox. Analysis by Autoza of DVSA’s MOT anonymised data for 2025. Last updated 10 November 2026.

Key findings

  1. At the first MOT, small cars differ.A Vauxhall Corsa failed its first MOT 14.3% of the time (29,897 tests) and a Ford Fiesta 9.1% (21,859 tests): 57% more often. The Hyundai i10 (16.4%, 7,783 tests) and i20 (15.6%, 6,504 tests) failed more often than the Corsa, so this is a spread across small cars, not one model.
  2. At ten years old the spread is wider.At ten years old a Renault Clio failed 44.5% of the time (24,050 tests) and a Volkswagen Golf 18.1% (67,353 tests), about 2.5 times as often. The first-MOT gap between the Corsa and the Fiesta has closed by then: 36.7% and 35.2%.
  3. Mileage is a second clock, up to a point.For cars aged 6 to 7, the initial fail rate was 9.2% under 20,000 miles (350,188 tests) and 17.9% at 40,000 to 60,000 miles (1,491,480 tests): roughly double. It reaches 22.2% at 80,000 to 100,000 miles and 22.4% at 100,000 to 120,000, then eases to 19.3% at 160,000 miles or more, probably because only the better-kept cars reach those mileages.
  4. Cars that barely move fail about half as often.Cars aged 5 to 14 driven under 3,000 miles a year failed 13.4% of the time, against 24.7% for cars of the same age (0.54 times; 1,299,849 tests). Annual mileage here is the odometer divided by age, and low-use cars may also be better looked after, so this is not proof that low mileage itself prevents failures.
  5. Where a fail is fixed on the spot depends on the area.45.6% of initial fails at test stations in East London (268,239 tests) were fixed and passed at the station, against 7.9% in Aberdeen (254,259 tests) and 19.0% across Great Britain. That says how test stations work, such as whether they repair on site, not how anyone drives.
  6. The part behind the failure often depends on the model.Against cars of the same age, ball-joint dust covers appeared on 6.7% of Vauxhall Mokka tests (19 times the rate), track rod end play on 5.0% of Nissan Qashqai tests (5.2 times), a broken coil spring on 8.7% of Renault Clio tests (3.2 times) and a split CV boot on 6.1% of Peugeot 2008 tests (8.4 times). Most are routine repairs; a broken coil spring or a worn ball joint is the kind of safety item the test exists to catch.
  7. Tyres stand out on the Tesla Model 3 and Model Y.Tyre defects appeared on 11.2% of the 87,481 Tesla Model 3 tests and 11.7% of the 34,928 Model Y tests, against 5.9% expected for cars of the same age and mileage: 1.9 times and 2.0 times. Brake defects were well below par, which fits regenerative braking taking much of the work.

Every figure is the DVSA-basis initial fail rate unless it says “outright”. Method, definitions and caveats are below.

How the same model fares as it ages

Failure rises with age for every model, but not at the same speed. These tables show the initial fail rate for popular models at their first MOT, at 4 to 5 years, at 7 to 8 and at 10, with the number of tests and the 95% margin. The last column compares all ages together with cars of the same age and mileage, which takes out the fact that a model sold for years is mostly old cars on the road. Models are listed A to Z within each group: this is not a league table, and the figures describe a model, not any one car.

Superminis and city cars

Superminis and city cars: initial fail rate (DVSA basis) by age, with tests and 95% margin
ModelFirst MOTAged 4 to 5Aged 7 to 8Aged 10All ages
Citroen C38.1% ±0.511,721 testsoutright 6.2%11.6% ±0.425,288 tests25.3% ±0.444,413 tests34.4% ±0.812,321 testsoutright 26.5%31.7%against 25.1%+6.7 points231,621 tests
Fiat 5009.6% ±0.610,378 testsoutright 7.0%13.8% ±0.426,657 tests24.8% ±0.446,835 tests36.0% ±0.537,316 testsoutright 30.8%32.2%against 25.5%+6.7 points344,374 tests
Ford Fiesta9.1% ±0.421,859 testsoutright 6.7%13.0% ±0.278,328 tests21.3% ±0.2182,776 tests35.2% ±0.3122,392 testsoutright 27.2%34.4%against 29.2%+5.2 points1,360,707 tests
Honda Jazz6.0% ±0.59,572 testsoutright 3.6%7.7% ±0.325,196 tests11.4% ±0.338,012 tests16.5% ±0.518,012 testsoutright 11.7%25.6%against 28.6%−3.0 points339,813 tests
Hyundai i1016.4% ±0.87,783 testsoutright 11.2%14.2% ±0.614,861 tests19.2% ±0.444,786 tests23.4% ±0.622,097 testsoutright 17.6%27.4%against 23.8%+3.6 points250,748 tests
Hyundai i2015.6% ±0.96,504 testsoutright 10.6%12.2% ±0.610,490 tests17.5% ±0.520,293 tests22.8% ±0.712,608 testsoutright 17.8%27.4%against 25.5%+1.9 points133,062 tests
Kia Picanto11.8% ±0.79,056 testsoutright 8.4%14.1% ±0.520,357 tests18.4% ±0.429,669 tests26.3% ±0.713,523 testsoutright 21.8%28.6%against 23.1%+5.4 points190,252 tests
MINI hatch10.2% ±0.332,647 testsoutright 8.5%11.8% ±0.276,976 tests14.2% ±0.291,258 tests18.4% ±0.445,285 testsoutright 14.2%23.9%against 27.0%−3.1 points678,162 tests
Nissan Micra9.3% ±0.84,931 testsoutright 6.9%14.3% ±0.612,888 tests31.8% ±0.622,738 tests28.3% ±0.812,547 testsoutright 21.2%36.6%against 29.7%+7.0 points237,361 tests
Peugeot 20812.5% ±0.514,466 testsoutright 9.8%18.3% ±0.528,254 tests28.3% ±0.532,974 tests31.9% ±0.626,810 testsoutright 24.8%29.5%against 22.5%+7.0 points219,722 tests
Renault Clio11.9% ±0.86,882 testsoutright 9.5%16.2% ±0.520,425 tests34.2% ±0.539,132 tests44.5% ±0.624,050 testsoutright 39.0%43.0%against 29.6%+13.4 points306,747 tests
Skoda Fabia9.6% ±0.76,409 testsoutright 6.8%14.9% ±0.518,090 tests22.9% ±0.434,716 tests25.0% ±0.617,832 testsoutright 21.3%29.4%against 28.1%+1.3 points228,995 tests
Toyota Yaris7.7% ±0.331,355 testsoutright 4.5%10.0% ±0.347,592 tests17.5% ±0.355,777 tests20.9% ±0.530,054 testsoutright 15.0%26.8%against 27.0%−0.2 points478,896 tests
Vauxhall Corsa14.3% ±0.429,897 testsoutright 10.2%16.5% ±0.285,880 tests29.3% ±0.3105,097 tests36.7% ±0.384,684 testsoutright 31.1%35.4%against 27.5%+7.9 points897,413 tests
Volkswagen Polo8.5% ±0.419,649 testsoutright 6.5%12.6% ±0.355,855 tests24.5% ±0.389,670 tests28.2% ±0.451,283 testsoutright 24.0%32.6%against 28.0%+4.6 points632,066 tests

Small family cars and crossovers

Small family cars and crossovers: initial fail rate (DVSA basis) by age, with tests and 95% margin
ModelFirst MOTAged 4 to 5Aged 7 to 8Aged 10All ages
Audi A311.3% ±0.515,691 testsoutright 9.8%11.4% ±0.337,037 tests14.3% ±0.361,984 tests19.8% ±0.441,099 testsoutright 15.7%24.1%against 29.7%−5.6 points420,942 tests
BMW 3 Series15.5% ±0.79,738 testsoutright 13.4%13.0% ±0.342,872 tests15.1% ±0.355,060 tests20.5% ±0.431,212 testsoutright 16.4%24.2%against 32.0%−7.7 points471,320 tests
Ford Focus10.4% ±0.512,840 testsoutright 8.3%13.1% ±0.358,980 tests18.9% ±0.2111,312 tests28.1% ±0.374,335 testsoutright 22.0%32.2%against 31.1%+1.0 points897,506 tests
Ford Kuga8.5% ±0.421,990 testsoutright 6.7%12.0% ±0.339,654 tests16.4% ±0.374,217 tests25.7% ±0.530,146 testsoutright 20.5%20.6%against 23.2%−2.6 points312,077 tests
Kia Sportage11.5% ±0.425,066 testsoutright 7.7%15.3% ±0.347,018 tests19.4% ±0.370,216 tests28.8% ±0.621,812 testsoutright 24.1%22.9%against 22.5%+0.4 points301,417 tests
Nissan Juke7.5% ±0.414,792 testsoutright 5.5%13.2% ±0.336,609 tests22.2% ±0.361,003 tests35.3% ±0.538,338 testsoutright 30.9%30.2%against 24.6%+5.7 points328,254 tests
Nissan Qashqai10.4% ±0.337,667 testsoutright 7.6%12.7% ±0.362,922 tests22.4% ±0.2106,966 tests31.4% ±0.455,601 testsoutright 27.7%31.0%against 26.3%+4.7 points600,115 tests
Peugeot 200810.1% ±0.512,582 testsoutright 7.4%15.0% ±0.429,355 tests28.4% ±0.532,264 tests37.0% ±0.716,707 testsoutright 30.0%25.9%against 19.5%+6.4 points145,389 tests
Vauxhall Astra11.0% ±1.22,618 testsoutright 8.7%14.8% ±0.612,620 tests21.5% ±0.375,386 tests33.0% ±0.446,698 testsoutright 26.9%34.2%against 32.9%+1.3 points584,207 tests
Vauxhall Mokka10.6% ±0.419,117 testsoutright 8.3%16.7% ±0.614,419 tests31.1% ±0.368,552 tests37.4% ±0.541,828 testsoutright 30.9%30.8%against 21.8%+9.0 points254,046 tests
Volkswagen Golf8.4% ±0.422,166 testsoutright 7.0%9.6% ±0.268,643 tests14.5% ±0.2131,993 tests18.1% ±0.367,353 testsoutright 14.9%25.0%against 30.4%−5.4 points875,902 tests
Volkswagen Tiguan12.4% ±0.517,297 testsoutright 10.6%10.6% ±0.348,550 tests14.4% ±0.355,862 tests25.1% ±0.619,350 testsoutright 22.1%18.6%against 23.0%−4.4 points255,818 tests

Electric cars

Too new for the older age bands: a dash means fewer than 1,000 tests, or none.

Electric cars: initial fail rate (DVSA basis) by age, with tests and 95% margin
ModelFirst MOTAged 4 to 5Aged 7 to 8Aged 10All ages
Nissan Leaf9.4% ±0.67,838 testsoutright 6.9%12.7% ±0.516,191 tests21.7% ±0.89,577 tests35.2% ±1.53,864 testsoutright 31.2%19.7%against 16.9%+2.8 points53,144 tests
Tesla Model 315.1% ±0.517,058 testsoutright 13.7%15.6% ±0.356,341 tests––15.5%against 14.0%+1.5 points87,481 tests
Tesla Model Y16.4% ±0.429,040 testsoutright 15.0%–––15.6%against 12.1%+3.5 points34,928 tests

The small grey line under a first-MOT or ten-year figure is the outright fail rate, where a car fixed at the station counts as a pass. “All ages” is the model’s rate across every age, against the rate for cars of the same age and mileage, with the gap in percentage points. A dash means fewer than 1,000 tests. A model name links to our fault guide for it.

Mileage is a second clock

Cars of the same age fail more as the odometer climbs, up to a point. For cars aged 6 to 7, the rate roughly doubles between the lowest mileage band and 40,000 to 60,000 miles, keeps rising to about 80,000 miles and is level from there to 120,000. Above that the rate eases, which probably reflects the better-kept cars that reach those mileages.

Initial fail rate by odometer reading for cars aged 6 to 7 and 10 to 11
Miles on the clockCars aged 6 to 7Cars aged 10 to 11
under 20,0009.2%outright 6.7%350,188 tests12.3%outright 9.2%83,047 tests
20,000 to 40,00013.9%outright 10.9%1,335,440 tests18.4%outright 14.4%436,649 tests
40,000 to 60,00017.9%outright 14.6%1,491,480 tests25.0%outright 20.1%875,329 tests
60,000 to 80,00020.6%outright 16.9%772,608 tests29.9%outright 24.6%1,094,098 tests
80,000 to 100,00022.2%outright 18.2%280,284 tests32.8%outright 27.2%912,297 tests
100,000 to 120,00022.4%outright 17.9%98,604 tests34.0%outright 28.2%544,581 tests
120,000 to 140,00020.6%outright 16.0%44,378 tests34.0%outright 28.1%273,878 tests
140,000 to 160,00019.8%outright 14.6%23,876 tests33.8%outright 27.4%128,130 tests
160,000 or more19.3%outright 13.3%38,337 tests32.1%outright 24.7%135,316 tests

Cars that hardly move

Grouping cars aged 5 to 14 by the miles they cover each year (the odometer reading divided by age) shows the same thing from the other side: the few that cover under 3,000 miles a year fail about half as often as other cars of their age. Annual mileage here is derived, not recorded, and low-use cars may also be better looked after.

Initial fail rate by miles driven a year, cars aged 5 to 14, against the rate expected for their age
Miles a yearInitial fail rateExpected for cars of the same ageRatioTests
under 3,00013.4%outright 10.1%24.7%outright 20.0%0.541,299,849
3,000 to 5,00020.1%outright 15.9%25.4%outright 20.6%0.793,334,702
5,000 to 7,00025.2%outright 20.4%25.6%outright 20.8%0.984,973,756
7,000 to 9,00028.0%outright 23.1%25.6%outright 20.8%1.104,656,551
9,000 to 12,00029.1%outright 24.1%25.2%outright 20.5%1.163,844,588
12,000 to 16,00028.7%outright 23.4%24.2%outright 19.6%1.181,458,170
16,000 or more25.1%outright 19.1%22.0%outright 17.8%1.14562,992

Why cars fail, model by model

Every defect on a failing test is filed under one of DVSA’s 13 top-level groups. For each model we compare the share of its tests carrying a defect in the group with the share you would expect for cars of the same age and mileage. The table shows the robust findings only, at most the three largest higher-than-expected and the two largest lower-than-expected for each model; the CSV has every model and every group. A finding is robust where the sample is large and the gap is well beyond chance (the method has the exact rule).

Robust failure-category findings by model, against cars of the same age and mileage
Model and defect groupShare of its testsExpected for the same age and mileageCompared with expectedTests
Audi A3
Steering0.4%2.2%Lower: 0.2 times expected420,942
Road wheels0.3%0.5%Lower: 0.6 times expected420,942
BMW 3 Series
Road wheels1.1%0.5%Higher: 2.1 times expected471,320
Steering0.6%2.5%Lower: 0.3 times expected471,320
Body, chassis and structure1.2%4.2%Lower: 0.3 times expected471,320
Dacia Duster
Lamps, reflectors and electrical14.4%5.2%Higher: 2.8 times expected81,865
Steering2.6%1.0%Higher: 2.8 times expected81,865
Body, chassis and structure3.0%1.1%Higher: 2.6 times expected81,865
Fiat 500
Suspension14.6%8.1%Higher: 1.8 times expected344,374
Body, chassis and structure3.5%2.4%Higher: 1.5 times expected344,374
Identification of the vehicle0.4%0.2%Higher: 1.4 times expected344,374
Road wheels0.1%0.3%Lower: 0.3 times expected344,374
Steering0.7%1.6%Lower: 0.5 times expected344,374
Ford Fiesta
Steering3.7%2.0%Higher: 1.8 times expected1,360,707
Lamps, reflectors and electrical16.3%11.2%Higher: 1.5 times expected1,360,707
Tyres8.0%6.3%Higher: 1.3 times expected1,360,707
Hyundai i10
Brakes7.8%4.7%Higher: 1.7 times expected250,748
Visibility6.3%3.8%Higher: 1.7 times expected250,748
Lamps, reflectors and electrical11.2%8.2%Higher: 1.4 times expected250,748
Body, chassis and structure0.9%2.1%Lower: 0.4 times expected250,748
Road wheels0.1%0.3%Lower: 0.5 times expected250,748
Kia Picanto
Brakes9.6%4.6%Higher: 2.1 times expected190,252
Seat belts and SRS1.1%0.6%Higher: 1.9 times expected190,252
Visibility6.1%3.8%Higher: 1.6 times expected190,252
Road wheels0.2%0.3%Lower: 0.7 times expected190,252
Kia Sportage
Brakes7.8%4.5%Higher: 1.8 times expected301,417
Steering2.1%1.3%Higher: 1.6 times expected301,417
Body, chassis and structure0.8%1.7%Lower: 0.5 times expected301,417
Seat belts and SRS0.3%0.6%Lower: 0.6 times expected301,417
Mercedes-Benz C-Class
Road wheels0.9%0.5%Higher: 1.9 times expected357,761
Body, chassis and structure1.0%3.5%Lower: 0.3 times expected357,761
Steering0.7%2.2%Lower: 0.3 times expected357,761
Nissan Juke
Steering5.5%1.6%Higher: 3.4 times expected328,254
Road wheels0.7%0.3%Higher: 2.0 times expected328,254
Visibility6.2%3.6%Higher: 1.7 times expected328,254
Nissan Qashqai
Steering6.4%1.8%Higher: 3.6 times expected600,115
Seat belts and SRS1.5%0.7%Higher: 2.1 times expected600,115
Body, chassis and structure4.3%2.5%Higher: 1.7 times expected600,115
Identification of the vehicle0.2%0.3%Lower: 0.8 times expected600,115
Peugeot 208
Body, chassis and structure6.9%1.7%Higher: 4.0 times expected219,722
Noise, emissions and leaks6.3%1.9%Higher: 3.3 times expected219,722
Lamps, reflectors and electrical11.3%7.0%Higher: 1.6 times expected219,722
Identification of the vehicle0.1%0.2%Lower: 0.5 times expected219,722
Peugeot 2008
Body, chassis and structure7.6%1.2%Higher: 6.4 times expected145,389
Noise, emissions and leaks3.2%1.6%Higher: 2.1 times expected145,389
Lamps, reflectors and electrical10.1%5.3%Higher: 1.9 times expected145,389
Identification of the vehicle0.1%0.2%Lower: 0.6 times expected145,389
Steering0.7%1.0%Lower: 0.7 times expected145,389
Renault Clio
Steering5.4%2.1%Higher: 2.7 times expected306,747
Seat belts and SRS2.0%1.0%Higher: 2.0 times expected306,747
Suspension19.3%10.0%Higher: 1.9 times expected306,747
Tesla Model 3
Tyres11.2%5.9%Higher: 1.9 times expected87,481
Suspension2.4%1.4%Higher: 1.7 times expected87,481
Body, chassis and structure0.1%0.3%Lower: 0.2 times expected87,481
Seat belts and SRS0.1%0.4%Lower: 0.3 times expected87,481
Tesla Model Y
Tyres11.7%5.9%Higher: 2.0 times expected34,928
Brakes0.5%1.4%Lower: 0.4 times expected34,928
Visibility1.0%2.5%Lower: 0.4 times expected34,928
Toyota Yaris
Visibility5.5%4.3%Higher: 1.3 times expected478,896
Steering0.3%1.8%Lower: 0.2 times expected478,896
Road wheels0.2%0.3%Lower: 0.6 times expected478,896
Vauxhall Corsa
Steering5.2%1.8%Higher: 2.8 times expected897,413
Noise, emissions and leaks4.7%2.9%Higher: 1.7 times expected897,413
Visibility6.3%4.2%Higher: 1.5 times expected897,413
Road wheels0.3%0.4%Lower: 0.7 times expected897,413
Vauxhall Mokka
Steering3.8%1.3%Higher: 2.9 times expected254,046
Suspension14.4%5.8%Higher: 2.5 times expected254,046
Noise, emissions and leaks3.3%1.9%Higher: 1.8 times expected254,046
Road wheels0.2%0.3%Lower: 0.5 times expected254,046
Volkswagen Golf
Steering0.9%2.3%Lower: 0.4 times expected875,902
Lamps, reflectors and electrical7.9%12.0%Lower: 0.7 times expected875,902
Volkswagen Polo
Steering3.6%1.9%Higher: 1.9 times expected632,066
Body, chassis and structure5.0%3.2%Higher: 1.6 times expected632,066
Noise, emissions and leaks4.6%3.1%Higher: 1.5 times expected632,066

“Share of its tests” is the percentage of all that model’s 2025 tests with at least one defect in the group. A model can be lower than expected in a group and still fail overall, and the other way round.

The parts behind the numbers

The defect file goes down to the specific part. These are the ones behind the headline findings, with the same defect’s rate for cars of the same age band for comparison. This comparison allows for age only, not mileage, and each is a routine repair or a safety item according to DVSA’s grade (Major or Dangerous), not a verdict on the model. A recall is a free fix and is a separate question.

The specific defects behind the headline failure-category findings
ModelThe defect, in DVSA’s termsGradeShare of its testsCars of the same ageRatio
Vauxhall Mokka254,046 testsBall-joint dust cover no longer keeps dirt outMajor6.68%0.35%19.0 times
Nissan Qashqai600,115 testsTrack rod end ball joint has excessive playMajor4.98%0.96%5.2 times
Renault Clio306,747 testsCoil spring fractured or brokenMajor8.65%2.68%3.2 times
Peugeot 2008145,389 testsConstant velocity (CV) boot split or insecureMajor6.11%0.73%8.4 times
Vauxhall Corsa897,413 testsTrack rod end dust cover damaged or deterioratedMajor3.20%0.39%8.1 times
Ford Fiesta1,360,707 testsStop lamp not workingMajor6.17%2.12%2.9 times
Hyundai i10250,748 testsDaytime running lamps not workingMajor0.86%0.03%32.7 times

By postcode area: where a fail is fixed on the spot

DVSA records the postcode area of the test station, not of the owner. The table covers all 118 areas with the initial fail rate as tested and allowing for the age of the cars (so an area with an older fleet is not marked down for it), the outright fail rate on the same basis, and the share of initial fails that were fixed and passed at the station. Each area has a page of its own with the figures, how it compares and what fails there.

The share fixed on the spot varies from 7.7% in Kirkcaldy (Fife) to 45.6% in East London, against 19.0% nationally. That reflects how and where testing is done, such as whether a station repairs on site, and not the standard of anyone’s driving. It also changes how big the gaps between areas look: between the areas with the highest and lowest age-adjusted rates the gap is 1.9 times on DVSA’s measure but 3.0 times on outright fails, because so many fails in some areas are fixed and passed on the spot.

Showing 118 of 118 areas. Select a column heading to sort.

DundeeDD136,16034.9%38.6%±0.335.7%7.8%Suspension
Kirkcaldy (Fife)KY186,85836.2%38.6%±0.335.7%7.7%Suspension
AberdeenAB254,25932.0%35.9%±0.233.2%7.9%Suspension
Shetland (Lerwick)ZE12,37230.8%35.4%±1.127.6%22.3%Brakes
PaisleyPA152,36030.7%34.8%±0.330.7%12.2%Suspension
FalkirkFK143,75729.7%34.3%±0.330.7%10.7%Suspension
MotherwellML164,97029.2%34.3%±0.330.8%10.8%Suspension
PerthPH98,54130.5%33.9%±0.431.3%8.0%Suspension
EdinburghEH418,76430.0%33.3%±0.230.2%9.5%Suspension
BristolBS575,55534.0%33.0%±0.127.6%16.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
KilmarnockKA178,07629.2%32.8%±0.328.6%13.0%Suspension
ExeterEX374,48335.2%32.7%±0.227.9%14.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
PlymouthPL339,44935.3%32.5%±0.228.5%12.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
Llandrindod WellsLD28,36834.4%32.4%±0.627.4%15.2%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
LincolnLN188,50832.2%32.1%±0.328.4%11.7%Suspension
SunderlandSR110,60830.5%32.1%±0.328.5%11.3%Suspension
TruroTR203,28434.9%32.1%±0.228.4%11.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
GlasgowG532,33427.8%32.0%±0.228.1%12.5%Suspension
SalisburySP159,00633.8%32.0%±0.327.1%15.2%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
BlackpoolFY141,30032.2%31.7%±0.327.0%14.6%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
CardiffCF539,76231.3%31.6%±0.227.0%14.6%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
HullHU231,61731.1%31.6%±0.227.9%11.9%Suspension
InvernessIV143,02029.0%31.5%±0.328.6%9.4%Suspension
BathBA281,12333.3%31.4%±0.226.5%15.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
SwanseaSA420,24631.3%31.2%±0.225.8%17.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
BrightonBN402,21632.8%31.1%±0.226.2%15.7%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
DarlingtonDL192,42630.1%31.1%±0.325.9%16.8%Suspension
TorquayTQ169,27834.5%31.0%±0.326.4%14.7%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
HuddersfieldHD136,72629.2%30.8%±0.326.6%13.8%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
Galashiels (Borders)TD63,58728.9%30.7%±0.425.3%17.6%Suspension
ChesterCH369,87730.3%30.6%±0.225.7%15.8%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
PortsmouthPO470,97532.6%30.6%±0.225.6%16.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
NewportNP290,37531.0%30.5%±0.225.4%16.6%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
WiganWN154,43529.6%30.2%±0.324.7%18.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
YorkYO315,82329.5%30.2%±0.226.5%12.0%Suspension
BournemouthBH348,75432.0%30.0%±0.224.6%17.6%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
TauntonTA217,05032.7%29.8%±0.224.9%16.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
CarlisleCA198,01228.1%29.5%±0.224.0%18.7%Suspension
NorthamptonNN451,76029.3%29.5%±0.224.2%17.9%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
DorchesterDT130,37433.2%29.4%±0.323.9%18.5%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
HalifaxHX83,05229.3%29.4%±0.422.7%22.8%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
Outer HebridesHS14,82228.7%29.4%±0.924.5%16.5%Suspension
GloucesterGL410,59830.7%29.2%±0.225.2%13.7%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
Kirkwall (Orkney)KW27,96028.8%29.2%±0.623.8%18.6%Suspension
Stoke-on-TrentST369,77228.6%29.0%±0.225.8%11.1%Suspension
TeessideTS308,13728.4%29.0%±0.223.6%18.7%Suspension
LancasterLA180,36229.2%28.8%±0.223.6%18.2%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
LeedsLS373,06028.1%28.7%±0.225.0%13.2%Suspension
HarrogateHG93,40926.1%28.6%±0.424.9%13.1%Suspension
StockportSK335,29527.1%28.6%±0.223.5%18.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
CreweCW201,50827.4%28.5%±0.223.8%16.7%Suspension
SwindonSN296,00629.1%28.5%±0.224.2%15.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
NottinghamNG615,13728.8%28.4%±0.124.2%14.8%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
WarringtonWA340,55326.7%28.4%±0.223.9%16.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
LlandudnoLL317,46229.9%28.2%±0.223.7%16.0%Suspension
WatfordWD131,73726.0%28.2%±0.324.3%14.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
NewcastleNE556,80826.8%28.1%±0.123.0%18.3%Suspension
SouthamptonSO406,85428.9%28.0%±0.222.5%19.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
WalsallWS238,97928.3%28.0%±0.222.2%20.8%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
PrestonPR305,31227.3%27.9%±0.222.6%19.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
DoncasterDN433,68428.0%27.8%±0.223.0%17.4%Suspension
NorwichNR456,45829.4%27.8%±0.123.4%15.5%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
CanterburyCT256,71529.0%27.7%±0.223.1%16.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
CambridgeCB235,69828.3%27.6%±0.221.9%20.6%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
ShrewsburySY225,17828.4%27.6%±0.223.1%16.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
GuildfordGU453,05927.7%27.5%±0.222.0%20.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
IpswichIP395,53129.0%27.5%±0.222.1%19.5%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
DurhamDH165,41026.3%27.4%±0.322.9%16.8%Suspension
OxfordOX372,10428.0%27.4%±0.222.4%18.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
TelfordTF126,24028.2%27.4%±0.323.9%12.7%Suspension
ColchesterCO263,63428.6%27.2%±0.222.2%18.2%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
TonbridgeTN444,86327.9%27.0%±0.221.7%19.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
LiverpoolL363,25226.1%26.8%±0.220.9%22.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
HerefordHR124,37828.1%26.5%±0.322.5%15.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
PeterboroughPE617,73527.0%26.5%±0.121.3%19.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
WakefieldWF294,94826.3%26.5%±0.222.0%16.8%Suspension
WorcesterWR196,04327.1%26.5%±0.221.9%17.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
OldhamOL228,14525.7%26.4%±0.221.7%17.7%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
BoltonBL254,32825.0%26.3%±0.221.8%17.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
ManchesterM498,54327.1%26.3%±0.120.1%23.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
DumfriesDG77,77825.6%26.1%±0.422.0%15.5%Suspension
StevenageSG243,29225.8%26.1%±0.220.1%23.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
Milton KeynesMK349,98825.7%26.0%±0.220.5%21.2%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
WolverhamptonWV224,42925.8%25.8%±0.219.5%24.5%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
RedhillRH346,77426.0%25.5%±0.220.8%18.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
DudleyDY225,52326.1%25.4%±0.219.1%24.8%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
DerbyDE458,77125.1%25.3%±0.120.6%18.6%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
ChelmsfordCM399,80524.3%25.2%±0.219.3%23.7%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
LeicesterLE589,08225.8%25.2%±0.119.7%21.7%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
MedwayME355,17825.7%25.2%±0.218.6%26.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
St AlbansAL147,25424.0%25.2%±0.320.1%20.2%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
ReadingRG506,80425.2%25.1%±0.120.1%20.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
BradfordBD295,50725.9%25.0%±0.220.1%19.3%Suspension
CoventryCV491,02625.0%24.9%±0.119.8%20.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
Hemel HempsteadHP321,23124.7%24.6%±0.218.6%24.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
SheffieldS749,00624.7%24.4%±0.119.4%20.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
BlackburnBB288,45024.4%24.2%±0.218.8%22.4%Suspension
South East LondonSE260,88324.5%24.1%±0.214.7%38.8%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
LutonLU219,15825.1%23.9%±0.215.5%35.2%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
West LondonW89,46222.4%23.9%±0.317.9%25.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
South West LondonSW143,58822.8%23.8%±0.318.3%23.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
North West LondonNW222,60321.3%23.5%±0.215.8%33.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
BirminghamB1,038,78924.0%23.4%±0.116.5%29.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
DartfordDA244,50122.2%23.3%±0.215.2%34.7%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
BromleyBR120,17321.0%23.0%±0.317.2%25.6%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
East LondonE268,23922.3%22.9%±0.212.5%45.6%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
SouthendSS291,45323.2%22.9%±0.216.9%26.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
North LondonN224,13823.1%22.8%±0.213.4%41.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
CroydonCR225,83322.2%22.6%±0.214.8%34.4%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
EnfieldEN195,43221.7%22.3%±0.214.3%36.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
Kingston upon ThamesKT277,51321.5%22.1%±0.216.8%24.2%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
TwickenhamTW243,72421.5%22.1%±0.215.5%29.9%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
HarrowHA200,03821.5%21.7%±0.214.1%34.9%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
RomfordRM270,16420.6%21.4%±0.213.2%38.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
IlfordIG145,79820.0%21.2%±0.212.9%39.3%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
SloughSL238,85521.5%21.2%±0.214.2%33.0%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
Southall/UxbridgeUB204,59920.7%20.6%±0.212.0%41.5%Lamps, reflectors and electrical
SuttonSM74,60021.0%20.3%±0.315.0%26.1%Lamps, reflectors and electrical

Method and definitions

Initial fail rate (the headline everywhere)
The share of first tests that ended in a fail, or in a fail that was repaired at the test station and passed (a “pass after rectification”). This is the figure DVSA publishes. Across Great Britain in 2025 it was 27.7%.
Outright fail rate (shown second)
The share that failed outright, with a car fixed at the station counted as a pass. It was 22.4% nationally. It is lower than the initial fail rate; 100 minus it is the “passed on the day” basis of our model guides’ pass rates, so the two are never mixed in one comparison.
Passed on the day (the figure on our model guides)
A pass, or a fail fixed at the station and then passed: everything that is not an outright fail. Nationally 77.6%. Our model guides’ “MOT pass rate” uses this basis (from a sample of the same 2025 file), so it is about five points higher than 100 minus DVSA’s initial fail rate.
Fixed at the station
A fail repaired and passed at the test station. Across the country 19.0% of initial fails ended that way (1,745,654 tests).
First MOT
A test 1,020 to 1,139 days after the car was first used: the first test at about three years old.
Age bands
Age 4 to 5, 7 to 8 and 10 are the nearest whole year of age at the test. “Cars aged 6 to 7” and “aged 10 to 11” are the same, for the mileage tables.
Same age, or same age and mileage
Wherever a model or area is compared with “expected”, expected is what all cars of the same age (in whole years) and the same 20,000-mile band scored nationally. The model’s own age and mileage mix is therefore taken out of the comparison. The specific-defect table (the parts) allows for age only.
Age-adjusted (areas)
An area’s age-adjusted rate is what its cars would have scored at the national rate for each age, scaled to the national figure (indirect standardisation, age in whole years). The margin is the 95% margin on that figure. A version that also allows for mileage is in the area download.
Failure categories and “robust”
Every defect is filed under one of DVSA’s 13 top-level groups (lamps and electrical, suspension, brakes, tyres and so on). A test counts once per group, however many defects it has in it. A finding is called robust only where there are about 300 or more expected cases, the difference is at least six standard errors (a z-score of 6 or more) and the ratio is at least 1.25 (or at most 0.8). Every model in the table has at least 20,000 tests.

How the data was prepared

  • Source: DVSA’s MOT anonymised test results and defect (test item) data for all of 2025, published under the Open Government Licence v3.0. We use every class 4 normal test (cars and light vans up to 3,000kg) that ended in a pass, fail or pass after rectification: 33,210,823 first tests after leaving out retests, aborted tests and a few hundred malformed lines. It is the complete file, not a sample.
  • The national figures are close to DVSA’s own published statistics, which cover a different period and classes: for classes 3 and 4 in the financial year 2025 to 2026 DVSA reports an initial failure rate of 27.51% and a final failure rate of 22.30%; for class 4 in the calendar year 2025 we count 27.68% and 22.43% (outright fail, the same idea as DVSA’s final failure). Every failing test in the results file was matched to its defect records.
  • One vehicle can count more than once: a car given two normal tests in the year (not a retest) is two tests, and we do not deduplicate. We could not measure how often this happens across the full year (the raw rows were deleted after aggregation); in the sample slices of the same file that we kept, 0.9% of tests came from a vehicle with more than one normal test in them, which understates the full-year share.
  • Models: DVSA’s model field is free text typed from the V5C, so we group by make and the first word of the model (with rules for BMW and Mercedes-Benz series, MINI, Tesla and Land Rover), which means a name such as “Citroen C4” includes its variants. Model tables cover cars only: vans and pick-ups were removed by name. A model appears only with at least 20,000 tests in the year, and an age figure is printed only with at least 1,000 tests behind it. Area and national tables are all class 4 first tests, as DVSA counts them.
  • Model margins are the usual 95% binomial margin on the printed rate and the number of tests; area margins are computed on the observed fails.
  • Areas: DVSA records the postcode area of the test station, not of the car’s owner. A handful of tests recorded against areas too small to report are pooled as “XX” in the area download and not shown on the pages.
  • Mileage: tests with an odometer reading of zero were left out. Annual mileage is the odometer reading divided by the car’s age, so it is derived, not recorded.

Definitions version 1.1. Version 1.0 (2026-10-23): First edition: initial fail (fail + fixed during the test) as the headline, outright fail second. Version 1.1 (2026-10-27): No figure changed. Added the three outcomes shown separately (passed with nothing to fix, fixed during the test, failed) and named “passed on the day” (pass + fixed during the test), the basis of the model guides’ pass rates; added fuel as an optional filter in the planner; corrected the comparison with DVSA’s published figures.

The same tests, both ways of counting

A test ends in one of three ways: a pass with nothing to fix, a fail fixed at the station and then passed, or a fail. DVSA’s initial fail rate counts the last two; “passed on the day”, the basis of our model guides’ pass rates, counts the first two. Here are the three outcomes as counted, so either figure can be checked.

MOT outcomes in 2025: passed with nothing to fix, fixed during the test, failed, and the two headline definitions
TestsPassed, nothing to fixFixed during the testFailedInitial fail (DVSA)Passed on the day
All class 4 tests33,210,823 tests72.3%5.3%22.4%27.7%77.6%
Cars (vans and pick-ups left out)30,199,991 tests72.9%5.1%22.0%27.1%78.0%
Cars at their first MOT1,377,647 tests89.1%2.4%8.5%10.9%91.5%
Nissan Qashqai (every age)600,115 tests69.0%4.5%26.5%31.0%73.5%
Nissan Juke (every age)328,254 tests69.8%4.8%25.4%30.2%74.6%
Ford Kuga (every age)312,077 tests79.4%4.3%16.3%20.6%83.7%
Vauxhall Corsa (every age)897,413 tests64.6%7.1%28.3%35.4%71.7%
Kia Sportage (every age)301,417 tests77.1%3.7%19.3%22.9%80.7%

The model rows are every age of the model together, so they mostly reflect how old its cars on the road are; the age-matched comparisons above are the fair ones. Which definition is used changes every figure by roughly the share fixed during the test (about 5 points), but it changes almost nothing about how models compare.

Source files, data dictionary and what is proven

The source is DVSA’s anonymised MOT data for 2025, listed on DVSA’s open data page (the data.gov.uk catalogue entry still lists 2023 and 2024 only). Checked 2026-10-27.

Two cuts of the same file

  • The complete 2025 file (all 12 months). January to December 2025 (12 monthly files, 202501 to 202512). 33,210,823 class 4 normal tests. Downloaded from DVSA on 23 Oct 2026 month by month (ranged reads of the two zips above; each monthly member was checked against its size in the zip directory). Raw rows were deleted after aggregation the same day. Used by /research/mot-2025 and its articles, the MOT planner, the fuel-and-age sections of five fault guides, the monthly asking-price list.
  • A sample of the 2025 file (about one test in ten, from nine months). January, February, April, May, July, August, September, October and November 2025 (each slice falls within a month or two; March, June and December are absent). 3,459,000 class 4 normal tests. Eight contiguous 60 MB slices of the 2025 results file, downloaded 12 Aug 2026 and kept. Used by the "MOT pass rate" block and the by-year and by-mileage tables on the model fault guides, compare pages, brand pages and the mileage tools.

How closely the sample matches the full year, on the “passed on the day” basis: All class 4 tests 77.3% in the sample, 77.6% in the full year; Nissan Qashqai 73.5% in the sample, 73.5% in the full year; Nissan Juke 73.7% in the sample, 74.6% in the full year; Ford Kuga 83.4% in the sample, 83.7% in the full year; Vauxhall Corsa 71.0% in the sample, 71.7% in the full year; Kia Sportage 80.5% in the sample, 80.7% in the full year.

The sample is not a designed random sample, so this agreement is evidence that it is representative, not proof.

Data dictionary

test_id
DVSA’s id for one test. Joins a test to its defect items. Never published.
vehicle_id
DVSA’s anonymised id for the vehicle. Not used to deduplicate: a vehicle with two normal tests in the year counts twice. Never published.
test_date
Date of the test. Age at the test; the month a test falls in.
test_class_id
MOT class. Class 4 only: cars, taxis, private hire, motor caravans and light goods vehicles up to 3,000 kg.
test_type
NT normal test, RT retest, PL/PV partial retests, ES/EI appeals. NT only. Retests and appeals are left out.
test_result
P passed, F failed, PRS passed after rectification at the station, ABR/ABRVE aborted, ABA abandoned, R refused. P, F and PRS only; the rest are left out (about 0.6% of class 4 normal tests in the sample).
test_mileage
Odometer reading recorded at the test. Used as recorded; the file has no unit column and we convert nothing. A zero or blank reading is “no reading”.
make, model
Free text from the vehicle record. Grouped by make and the first word of the model, with set rules for BMW and Mercedes-Benz series, MINI, Tesla and Land Rover; vans and pick-ups removed by name.
fuel_type
PE petrol, DI diesel, HY hybrid electric, ED electric diesel, EL electric, others. Petrol, diesel, hybrid (HY and ED) and electric; others are kept in all-fuel figures only.
first_use_date
Date the vehicle was first used. Age at the test = days from first use to the test ÷ 365.25, rounded. The first MOT is a test 1,020 to 1,139 days after first use.
postcode_area
Postcode area of the test station. Area tables. It is where the test took place, not where the owner lives.
rfr_id, rfr_type_code (item file)
The defect and its type: F fail, P fixed during the test (PRS), M minor, A advisory; with its grade (Major or Dangerous). F and P items only, filed under DVSA’s 13 top-level groups; a test counts once per group. Minor faults and advisories are not counted.

What is proven, and what is not

  • The two 2025 files are DVSA’s: DVSA’s own download page links them by these exact addresses, and their sizes on DVSA’s server equal the sizes our downloader read.
  • They hold 2025 tests: the results file has twelve monthly members, 202501 to 202512, and every test date in the slices we kept falls in 2025.
  • Every failing test in the full-year results file was matched to defect records (12 of 12 months).
  • The committed tables are reproducible from our aggregates: scripts/research/build-mot-products-data.py --check rebuilds them and finds no difference.
  • The sample agrees with the full year to within a point for the whole fleet and for the five most-read guide models.
  • Not proven: We cannot show a checksum of the raw 2025 files: DVSA publishes none, and our raw copy was deleted after aggregation. We hold DVSA’s size and server tag for each file.
  • Not proven: DVSA’s file has no unit column for the odometer reading; we have not confirmed whether any readings were typed in kilometres.
  • Not proven: The fuel is what DVSA records. Some of it is plainly wrong (a few Toyota Auris tests are recorded as electric), and hybrids of every kind share one code.
  • Not proven: Vans are removed by model name. A van or motor caravan recorded under a car name stays in the car figures.
  • Not proven: The data.gov.uk catalogue still lists only 2023 and 2024; the 2025 files are listed on DVSA’s own open data page.

What these figures cannot tell you

  • The MOT checks safety and emissions items, not the engine, clutch or gearbox, so this is one measure of how each car holds up rather than a full reliability verdict.
  • A figure describes a model (or an area), not any one car. Two cars of the same model, age and mileage can be in completely different condition, so check the car in front of you.
  • These are MOT failure reasons, not a verdict on reliability or on the owners. A dust cover, a bulb or a wiper blade is a routine repair; a broken coil spring or a worn ball joint is a safety item the test exists to catch. Cars of one model share a defect when an easily damaged part is common to them, which is a finding about parts and servicing.
  • A manufacturer recall is a free fix, not a verdict on the model.
  • The analysis is observational. It shows that two groups differ, not why. Where the page offers a possible reason it says so, and it is a possibility.
  • Regional differences may reflect how and where testing is done as well as the cars: whether a station repairs on site, the mix of stations and who books where. The figures describe where the test took place, not who owns the car.
  • Very high mileages: cars still on the road at 160,000 miles or more tend to be the well-kept ones, which probably explains why the rate eases there. Low mileage: low-use cars may also be better looked after, so low mileage is a marker, not a proven cause.

Downloads, citation and press contact

Every table on this page is available as a CSV. Each file opens with five comment lines (starting “#”) giving the source, the licence, the definitions and how to cite; most tools skip them (pandas: comment="#"). They are aggregates only: no registrations, VINs or test ids.

This edition: 2025 MOT tests, definitions version 1.1. This address always holds the 2025 edition; a later year gets an address of its own, so a citation of this page keeps pointing at these figures. The table under “The same tests, both ways of counting” is free to reuse with the credit below.

Cite, licence and press contact

Cite as

Autoza analysis of DVSA MOT anonymised data, 2025 (autoza.co.uk/research/mot-2025)

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0. Open Government Licence v3.0. The analysis is Autoza’s and is licensed CC BY 4.0: you are welcome to quote and reproduce these figures with the credit above.

A permanent copy of the tables is archived on Zenodo: DOI 10.5281/zenodo.23601275.

Press contact: Simon Creedon, founder, info@autoza.co.uk. We can talk through the method, supply a figure for a local area, and correct anything that is wrong; manufacturers and garages named here can reach us at the same address. The press kit has brand assets.

Use this chart on your site

Publishers and local sites are welcome to put the chart on a page: “MOT fail rate by postcode area, 2025”, with a second view, “First MOT fail rate by model, 2025”. It is free, sets no cookies, loads nothing from anywhere else, and carries its own source line linking back here. Please leave that line in place and do not change the figures. The terms are the same as for our other widgets.

Live preview

Code to copy

<iframe src="https://autoza.co.uk/embed/mot-fail-rate" data-autoza-embed title="MOT fail rate by postcode area, 2025 (Autoza)" width="100%" height="820" style="border:0;max-width:640px" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<script src="https://autoza.co.uk/embed.js" async></script>
<p>Source: <a href="https://autoza.co.uk/research/mot-2025">Autoza</a>, from DVSA MOT data</p>

To open on the model chart instead, use this code:

<iframe src="https://autoza.co.uk/embed/mot-fail-rate?chart=model" data-autoza-embed title="First MOT fail rate by model, 2025 (Autoza)" width="100%" height="820" style="border:0;max-width:640px" loading="lazy"></iframe>
<script src="https://autoza.co.uk/embed.js" async></script>
<p>Source: <a href="https://autoza.co.uk/research/mot-2025">Autoza</a>, from DVSA MOT data</p>

If your site does not allow frames: an image that links here

<a href="https://autoza.co.uk/research/mot-2025"><img src="https://autoza.co.uk/research/mot-2025/opengraph-image" alt="UK MOT results 2025: which used cars fail, and why. 27.7% of 33,210,823 first MOT tests in Great Britain ended in an initial fail. Source: Autoza analysis of DVSA MOT data, 2025." width="600" height="315" loading="lazy"></a>
<p>Source: <a href="https://autoza.co.uk/research/mot-2025">Autoza</a>, from DVSA MOT data</p>

To show one postcode area, add &area=KY (its code) to the frame’s address; it is marked in the chart. Data: Autoza analysis of DVSA MOT data, published under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Models on this page: fault guides and cars for sale